[F.Kruschewsky]

3 December, 208 - Sony A900 Field Review - 24MP and a Great Price

"Does the thought of a full-frame, 24 Megapixel camera with a large bright viewfinder and the ablilty to shoot 5 FPS in raw with a deep buffer make you salivate? Does the thought of having to spend $8000 for a camera like this have you weak in the knees?

Well, one alternative is the Sony A900, which started shipping in most markets within the past few weeks. It retails for under US $3,000, offers excellent image quality, and access to some great Zeiss glass as well as a large range of Sony and Konica / Minolta lenses.

I have been field testing the Sony A900 for the past few weeks, including on a recent landscape shoot in Arizona, and my field test report is now online."

Recomendo fortemente a leitura deste "Field Review". Vale a pena

"Link": http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/sony-a900.shtml

Boa Leitura!

[Pictus]

Sony A900 Update – One month on http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/a900-one-month.shtml
Sony A900 – A Second Opinion http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/A900-Second-Opinion.shtml

A A900 é a portátil da galera dos digital backs... 

[Leandro Federsoni]

Poxa seria muito interessante uma opcao de A900 com 24Mp e uma A900 de 12Mp....Todos esses fabricantes deveriam fazer do sensor o mesmo que o fabricantes de carros fazem com o motores.....O consumidor escolhe o motor ou sensor que quer levar.

Eu por exemplo optaria pelo sensor menos denso, inclusive entre a D3 e a D3x, pois alem dos 12Mp ser mais que suficiente para ISO baixo (DR & Resolucao), ele entrega uma curva bem mais linear na medida em que o ISO vai aumentando (Base do teste do Leo da A900 vs D700).

Ps. Apesar que hoje no Imaging-Resource saiu os JPGs da D3x e achei mesmo em ISO3200 melhor que da D3.

Valeu